IT Strategy

IT Strategy

Promote Your Page Too

Subscribe: Posts | Comments | Email

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact me
  • Business Intelligence
  • Business Strategy
  • Change Management

Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy

January 8, 2008 by Raj Sheelvant

Michael Porter’s ground breaking HBR article in 1979 on Five Competitive Forces called “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy” has been revised by the author after about three decades. His new work not only updates and extends but also reaffirms his findings. You can find the article in its entirety here. You can also listen to an interview with Michael Porter. A link to his interview is here.

porters-five-forces.JPG

In my view Michael Porter drives home an important point in his interview. Rivalry with the competitors does not need to be zero sum game. Most of the competition is focused on price and market segment gain. This invariable accelerates the move towards the commoditization of the product. This in the short run appears good for the consumers (because they get a good price) but in the long run its bad for them (because they will be left with no choice as many of the competitors will be driven away by the intense competition and the product will be a commodity product). This is the kind of environment when any competitive advantage is meaningless because the competition will imitate it eventually. That’s the assumption Nicholas Carr makes in his argument for “IT Doesn’t Matter”. BTW, he has written a new book The Big Switch (I have not read it yet but will read it soon). In a commoditized world, where perfect market is at work, price is the only tangible factor that balances supply and demand. Hence no need for IT to pursue differentiation.

According to Porter it does not have to be that way. So instead of mindless competition based on the price, multiple rivals can be successful by competing on different aspects of customer needs. This is the big take away from the revised Michael Porter’s Five Competitive Forces article. He calls this new competitive model as positive sum game where firms compete based on their core competency not to gain market share but to carve out a niche. Consumers will be willing to pay a price premium to get that level of ‘customized’ product/service. This is how everyone wins. In this scenario the business process which is based on firm’s core competency is going to be different for different competitors. And IT can play a major role in automating those core business processes. Positive sum competition is the basic assumption where IT can and will Matter.

Popularity: 59% [?]

Related posts:

  1. Operational Effectiveness is not Strategy
  2. Fleeting Competitive Advantage
  3. Is Outsourcing Eroding Competitive Advantage?
  4. Business System and Business Strategy
  5. Virgin America’s IT Strategy

Comments (4)

 

  1. Brian says:
    January 10, 2008 at 11:18 am

    In my opinion the problem with pursuing a Niche strategy is that you will possibly be a small player with a limited market. Should one successfully be able to carve out a niche in which customers are willing to pay the premium then there is an overwhelming demand on IT for continued innovative services or products. Customer’s expectation will become extremely high once accustomed to value added service and products, while this is not necessarily negative as we should always strive to improve. The positive sum game will have a threshold, as the expanding pie can only expand so much; it is inevitable that a customer will eventually come back to price regardless of the customized, value-added, super widget you are selling.

    The Devils Advocate

  2. Роберт says:
    May 31, 2009 at 1:34 am

    Да, похоже что в действительности – так оно и есть. P.S. Сайт, кстати, у вас прикольно сверстан :)

  3. лякa says:
    June 23, 2009 at 7:59 pm

    Занимательная и интересная статья у вас. В отличие от большинства других похожих почти нет воды! :)

  4. Stas-11111 says:
    September 2, 2009 at 3:51 am

    Thanks for article

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Translate

    Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanTraduzca al Español/SpanishTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduza ao Português/Portuguese日本語に翻訳しなさい /Japanese
    한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean中文翻译/Chinese Simplified中文翻译/Chinese Traditionalترجمة الى العربية/ArabicVertaal aan het Nederlands/DutchΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekПереведите к русскому/Russian
    Oversetter til Norsk/NorwegianÖversätta till Svensk/Swedishहिन्दी अनुवाद करने के लिए/HindiTradueix al català/CatalanTulkot uz latviešu/LatvianPreložiť do slovenčiny/SlovakПереклад на українську/Ukrainian

Popular Posts

  • Dell’s Game PC Turnaround Strategy
  • Virgin America's IT Strategy
  • Enterprise Application Implementation Strategy
  • SaaS CRM Disadvantages
  • McKinsey’s 7-S Strategy Framework
  • Evolving role of the IT Project Manager
  • A New Breed of IT Workers
  • SaaS in Large Organizations
  • About
  • Globalization of Labor - II

Recent Comments

  • Thersa Marrapese on 10 things to know about Cloud Computing Strategy
  • Writing Guide & Info on Innovation and People Skills
  • C on GE’s Diversification Strategy
  • Ava Klena on Ethnocentric Corporate Culture
  • Poker on Simplicity Minded Management
  • Intrenet marketing Consultants on Enterprise Application Implementation Strategy

Archives

  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007

Blogroll

  • Enterprise Irregulars
  • Internet Evolution
  • Nicholas Carr’s Blog
  • OnStrategies Perspectives
  • Sramana Mitra’s Blog
  • Steve’s IT Rants
  • Straight to the Source
  • Tech IT Easy
  • The Long Tail
  • The Visible Enterprise
  • Wikinomics

Categories

  • Business Intelligence
  • Business Strategy
  • Change Management
  • Cloud Computing
  • Collaboration
  • Cultural Intelligence
  • Enterprise 2.0
  • Enterprise Applications
    • CRM
    • ERP
  • Globalization
  • Green IT
  • Human Resource
  • Internet Strategy
  • Interview
  • IT Management
    • CIO
    • Knowledge Management
    • Project Management
    • Talent Management
  • IT Strategy
  • Marketing Strategy
    • Branding Strategy
  • Nicholas Carr
  • Outsourcing
  • PaaS
  • SaaS
  • Web 2.0

Meta

  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress

Recent Posts

  • Management by Analytics?
  • What’s the role of IT Business Analyst?
  • Borderless Innovation
  • Millennials’ Impact on Organization Structure
  • Crowd Sourcing Business Process Improvement
  • 2010, The Year of IT Project Managers?

Recent Comments

  • Thersa Marrapese on 10 things to know about Cloud Computing Strategy
  • Writing Guide & Info on Innovation and People Skills
  • C on GE’s Diversification Strategy
  • Ava Klena on Ethnocentric Corporate Culture
  • Poker on Simplicity Minded Management
  • Intrenet marketing Consultants on Enterprise Application Implementation Strategy

Author

About Me

Raj Sheelvant has more than 15 years of varied experience in the field of Information Technology and is passionate about aligning IT with Business needs.

Raj strongly believes that IT can be leveraged to create, sustain and enable Business Strategy. This is a blog that demonstrates value added by IT to the Strategy

Design by Web Hosting. In collaboration with HostMonster Review. Hosting Talk. HostGator Coupon.

© 2009 Copyright. All Rights Reserved.